Ultherapy Cost in Las Vegas — 2026 Pricing Guide Image

BHRC BLOG

Ultherapy Cost in Las Vegas — 2026 Pricing Guide

BHRC · SKIN & LASER · ULTHERAPY

Ultherapy is the most misunderstood treatment on most Las Vegas menus, in both directions. It is genuinely the only non-surgical device that reaches the SMAS — the same fibromuscular layer a facelift repositions — which is a real and unusual claim. It also produced a mean brow elevation of 1.7 millimetres in its pivotal study, which is a real and unusually specific number. Both facts belong in the same conversation. This guide covers what a treatment costs at BHRC Summerlin, how focused ultrasound actually works, the FDA history nearly every article gets wrong, what the pooled evidence shows, and exactly who should be told to see a surgeon instead.

Ultherapy non-surgical lift treatment at Beverly Hills Rejuvenation Center Summerlin
Ultherapy at BHRC Summerlin. Focused ultrasound reaches the SMAS — the same layer a surgeon works with — without breaking the skin.
Quick answer. At BHRC Summerlin, Ultherapy is from $1,200 for a single targeted area, from $2,500 for face and neck, and from $3,800 for the full protocol including décolletage. Rejuvenation Club members take 20% off. It is usually a single treatment, with results developing over three to six months as collagen remodels, and reported to last around a year. Expect lift, not a facelift: the pivotal study measured a mean brow elevation of 1.7 mm at 90 days, with 86% of patients judged improved by masked raters. It works best on mild-to-moderate laxity.
Ultherapy at BHRC Summerlin, at a glance.

  • Where: 1825 Festival Plaza Dr #180, Las Vegas, NV 89135 — free on-site parking
  • Who treats you: the BHRC clinical team
  • Sessions: usually one, with results over three to six months
  • Downtime: essentially none — transient redness and tenderness
  • Hours: Monday–Friday 9:00 AM – 7:00 PM, Saturday 9:00 AM – 4:00 PM · (725) 525-6821

1 · What it costs in Las Vegas

Bar chart of Ultherapy pricing at BHRC Summerlin: single area from $1,200, face and neck from $2,500, full protocol from $3,800
Face and neck is the most common request — it is the combination that produces a coherent result rather than treating one zone and leaving the boundary visible.
A note on comparison shopping. There is no neutral published Las Vegas or Nevada average for Ultherapy — the aggregate review sites that publish regional pricing do not have enough Nevada data to report it. The nearest national reference, RealSelf, put the US average at $2,609 across 732 member reviews with a range of $1,000 to $5,000, though that dataset is from 2023 and is blended across treatment areas. Any Las Vegas figure you see quoted as a market average is almost certainly invented. Compare per-area, and ask how many lines of treatment are included.

2 · How focused ultrasound actually reaches the SMAS

Ultherapy uses microfocused ultrasound with visualisation — MFU-V. The mechanism is genuinely different from every other non-surgical tightening device, and the difference is worth understanding because it explains both what it can do and what it cannot.

Transducers deliver ultrasound that converges at a fixed focal depth — 1.5 mm, 3.0 mm or 4.5 mm. At that focus, energy density is high enough to briefly raise tissue temperature above 60 °C, creating a discrete thermal coagulation point smaller than a cubic millimetre. Collagen contracts at around 65 °C and the body then remodels it. Tissue above and between the focal points is spared entirely — the epidermis is never breached.

Comparison table of Ultherapy microfocused ultrasound versus RF microneedling and lasers
The 4.5 mm depth corresponds to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system — the fibromuscular layer a surgical facelift repositions. No needle-based device reaches it.

The other distinctive feature is imaging. The system visualises tissue to about 8 mm depth. Worth being precise here, because the marketing overstates it: FDA’s cleared indication for the imaging is to ensure proper coupling of the transducer to the skin and to confirm appropriate depth of treatment such as to avoid bone. It is a coupling-and-safety check. The clinical literature describes it more expansively as a targeting advantage, and that is a fair clinical view — but it is not what the clearance says.

3 · The regulatory history, correctly

Almost every article says Ultherapy was “FDA-cleared in 2009 via 510(k).” That is wrong on both counts.

Timeline of Ultherapy FDA clearances from the 2009 De Novo classification through the 2026 knee indication
Note it is cleared, never approved — premarket approval does not apply to this device. Ultherapy PRIME is real: Merz launched it in September 2024 with a faster treatment time and a larger screen.

4 · What the evidence shows — including the numbers nobody quotes

Statistics from a 2025 meta-analysis of microfocused ultrasound showing 89% investigator-assessed improvement
That satisfaction gap is a lesson in reading aesthetic research: how a question is asked changes the answer by nearly thirty points.

The brow lift study

The pivotal published study (Alam et al., Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2010) treated 35 evaluable patients with a median age of 44. Three masked expert raters judged 30 of 35 — 86% — to show clinically significant brow lift at day 90. The mean elevation was 1.7 mm.

That number is the most useful anchor in this article. It is a real, measurable, blinded result. It is also 1.7 millimetres. If you understand that going in, Ultherapy is very likely to satisfy you. If you are expecting a surgical result, it will not.

Duration, and the gap between blinded and unblinded assessment

The ASDS says effects can last up to a year with follow-up treatments possible. The only twelve-month dataset (n=20) reported physician-assessed improvement in 95% of subjects at one year — but blinded photographic assessment found improvement in only 43% at day 90. Both numbers are from the same study. We publish both because publishing only the first would be misleading.

There is also no published trial establishing an optimal maintenance interval. The common annual-touch-up recommendation is practice convention, and a sensible one — but it is convention.

5 · Who it works on — and who should be told no

Close-up of an Ultherapy treatment at Beverly Hills Rejuvenation Center
Candidacy matters more with Ultherapy than with almost any other non-surgical treatment.
Two-column checklist of good Ultherapy candidates versus those who should be recommended for surgery
The published literature is unusually blunt here: patients with severe laxity, marked banding and a very heavy neck are not good candidates and should be recommended for surgical treatment.

The BMI finding deserves a sentence, because it is rarely mentioned. In the reviewed literature, outcomes were better in patients with a BMI at or below 30, and no change was detected in more than half of patients above that threshold. That is not a moral judgment — it is a physics one about how energy focuses through tissue — and it is the sort of thing an honest consultation covers before you pay.

There is no controlled trial comparing Ultherapy to a facelift, and the honest comparator is 1.7 mm of mean brow elevation. Any clinic implying equivalence to surgery is not describing this treatment.

6 · Discomfort, side effects and the rare ones

Ultherapy has a reputation for being uncomfortable, and the pooled mean pain score of 4.85 out of 10 is a fair reflection. Face and neck averaged 4.62; body work ran higher at 5.58. The sensation is brief, deep heat with each line of energy — intermittent rather than continuous, which most people find manageable once they know what it is.

Common and transient: tenderness, redness and slight swelling. Less common: bruising, welting and nerve-related effects such as paraesthesia.

The serious events, reported honestly. A 2025 systematic review examined 19 published articles covering 506 patients plus 106 reports from FDA’s MAUDE adverse-event database. In the published literature, serious events were limited — one case of subcutaneous atrophy. In MAUDE, the most frequently reported were lipoatrophy, neurologic effects including nerve damage, focal numbness, dysesthesia and ptosis, and scarring, with one report of facelift compromise. Crucially, MAUDE is voluntary reporting with no denominator — it cannot produce a rate, and anyone converting 106 reports into a percentage is making it up.

The review’s own conclusion on the fat-loss concern is worth quoting in spirit: the scientific literature lacks supporting evidence for it, and the reports that exist are anecdotal and largely unverified. That is neither a dismissal nor a confirmation, and pretending otherwise in either direction would be dishonest.

7 · Ultherapy or Morpheus8?

This is the actual decision most patients in Las Vegas are making, and the answer depends entirely on which problem you have.

Diagram comparing Ultherapy for laxity versus Morpheus8 for texture and when to consider surgery
Many patients end up doing both on different schedules. Your provider will assess which layer your concern actually lives in.

If you want the Morpheus8 side in depth, we wrote a full guide to Morpheus8 in Summerlin and Las Vegas covering pricing, the acne-scar evidence and the FDA skin-type limit that applies at higher energy settings.

Visit BHRC Summerlin
1825 Festival Plaza Dr #180, Las Vegas, NV 89135
(725) 525-6821 · Monday–Friday 9:00 AM – 7:00 PM, Saturday 9:00 AM – 4:00 PM
Treatment by the BHRC clinical team
Free on-site parking in Festival Plaza.
Consultations are free and carry no obligation.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Ultherapy cost in Las Vegas?

At BHRC Summerlin: from $1,200 for a single targeted area such as the brow, under-chin or décolletage; from $2,500 for face and neck; and from $3,800 for the full protocol including décolletage. Rejuvenation Club members take 20% off. There is no neutral published Nevada average to compare against — the national RealSelf average was $2,609 in 2023.

How many treatments do I need?

Usually one. Ultherapy is typically a single treatment with results developing over three to six months as collagen remodels. Some patients benefit from a second, and follow-up treatments can be performed — but there is no published trial establishing an optimal maintenance interval.

When will I see results?

Some immediate tightening from collagen contraction, then the real result over three to six months. Neocollagenesis begins within days and continues for weeks, with remodelling reported up to a year. This is not a treatment to judge at two weeks.

How long does it last?

The ASDS says effects can last up to a year, with follow-up treatments possible. The only twelve-month study reported 95% physician-assessed improvement at one year in 20 subjects — though blinded photographic assessment in the same study found improvement in 43% at 90 days. Both figures are real.

Is Ultherapy FDA-approved?

It is FDA-cleared, not approved — premarket approval does not apply to this device. It received De Novo classification in September 2009 for brow lift, then 510(k) clearances adding submental and neck tissue in 2012, décolleté lines in 2014, abdomen and arms in 2025, and knees in 2026.

Does it hurt?

It is uncomfortable rather than painful for most people. Pooled data puts the mean at 4.85 out of 10, with face and neck at 4.62 and body work at 5.58. The sensation is brief, deep heat with each line of energy, and it stops the moment the treatment does.

Is there downtime?

Essentially none. Expect tenderness, redness and slight swelling for a day or so. Bruising and transient tingling are less common but possible.

Am I a good candidate?

The published literature points to patients with mild-to-moderate laxity, normal wound healing, and a BMI at or below 30 — outcomes were notably better below that threshold. Patients with extensive photoaging, severe laxity, marked platysmal banding or a heavy neck are better served by surgery, and a good provider will say so.

Is it as good as a facelift?

No, and no trial has compared them. The honest anchor is the pivotal study’s mean brow elevation of 1.7 mm at 90 days, with 86% of patients judged improved by masked raters. That is a real result and for the right candidate a satisfying one — it is not surgery.

What is the first step?

A free consultation. Your provider will assess whether your concern is laxity, texture or volume, and whether Ultherapy, Morpheus8 or something else is the right answer — including when the right answer is a surgical referral.

Keep Reading

Ultherapy at a BHRC Studio Near You

Ultherapy is available at BHRC studios nationwide, including our main six. Tap your closest location to book a free consultation:

References & Further Reading

  1. U.S. Food & Drug Administration — De Novo Classification DEN080006 — Ulthera System, 2009. accessdata.fda.gov
  2. U.S. Food & Drug Administration — 510(k) K121700 — Ulthera System, submental and neck indication, 2012. accessdata.fda.gov
  3. U.S. Food & Drug Administration — 510(k) K134032 — Ulthera System, décolleté indication, 2014. accessdata.fda.gov
  4. U.S. Food & Drug Administration — 510(k) K233996 — Ulthera System (UC-1 Control Unit PRIME), 2024. accessdata.fda.gov
  5. U.S. Food & Drug Administration — 510(k) K260618 — Ulthera System, abdomen, arms and knees, 2026. accessdata.fda.gov
  6. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology — Alam M et al. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study, 2010. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Aesthetic Surgery Journal — Amiri M et al. Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization (MFU-V) Effectiveness and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2025. academic.oup.com
  8. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology — Fabi SG. Noninvasive skin tightening: focus on new ultrasound techniques, 2015. dovepress.com
  9. Dermatologic Surgery — Humphrey VS et al. Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization: A Systematic Review of Adverse Events and Risk of Subsequent Facelift Compromise, 2025. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology — Hitchcock TM, Dobke MK. Review of the safety profile for microfocused ultrasound with visualization, 2014. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. American Society for Dermatologic Surgery — Ultrasound Therapy for Sagging Skin. asds.net
  12. Cleveland Clinic — Ultherapy. my.clevelandclinic.org

Beverly Hills Rejuvenation Center. This content is for general education and does not create a physician-patient relationship or constitute medical advice. Ultherapy is an FDA-cleared device, not an FDA-approved one. Published outcome figures are study averages and not a guarantee of result. Candidacy is assessed individually and some patients are better served by surgical treatment. Prices shown are starting rates and are not a quote. Candidacy, dosing, results and pricing vary by person and are confirmed at a free consultation. Reviewed by the BHRC clinical team.

Request a Consultation

LIMITED APPOINTMENTS AVAILABLE

"*" indicates required fields

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Terms*
I Consent to Receive SMS and Email Notifications, Alerts & Occasional Marketing Communication from BHRC. Message Frequency Varies. Message & Data Rates May Apply. You Can Reply STOP to Unsubscribe from SMS at Any Time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Blog Category:

Related Blogs from Bhrc

Exosomes, Explained: What They Actually Are and What the Research Really Shows Image

Exosomes, Explained: What They Actually Are and What the Research Really Shows

Exosomes are real, the science is genuinely interesting, and the marketing has run well ahead of the evidence. What an exosome actually is, what the research supports, what it does not, and the five questions worth asking before you book.

Learn More
Peptide Stacking Guide: Which Peptides Can Be Combined Safely Image

Peptide Stacking Guide: Which Peptides Can Be Combined Safely

What is actually known about combining peptides — the regulatory reality, why simultaneous starts are a mistake, and the handling that does matter.

Learn More
Regenerative Therapies in West LA — PRP, Exosomes & What the Evidence Shows Image

Regenerative Therapies in West LA — PRP, Exosomes & What the Evidence Shows

An honest read on regenerative treatments: where PRP has real evidence, what FDA says about exosomes, and what these cost at BHRC West LA.

Learn More