Hexarelin, GHRP-2 & GHRP-6 — Doses Used in Humans and What the Evidence Shows Image

BHRC BLOG

Hexarelin, GHRP-2 & GHRP-6 — Doses Used in Humans and What the Evidence Shows

Growth Hormone Secretagogues · Evidence Review

This class has more real human data than almost any other peptide group — and no lawful compounding route. Both of those facts deserve saying out loud.

Peptide vials at Beverly Hills Rejuvenation Center
These three have more real human endocrinology behind them than most peptides sold today — and less of a lawful pathway.
The short answer. GHRP-2, GHRP-6 and hexarelin are all ghrelin receptor agonists — they release growth hormone, and they also release ACTH, cortisol and prolactin, because the receptor is not GH-specific. Unlike most marketed peptides, they have real human data, mostly from 1990s endocrinology studies. What they do not have is a lawful compounding pathway: GHRP-2 and GHRP-6 remain in FDA Category 2, hexarelin was never nominated at all, and all three are explicitly named on the WADA prohibited list at all times. The only agent in this entire class with an FDA-approved indication is tesamorelin.

1. One mechanism, three molecules

All three are synthetic agonists of the GHS-R1a receptor — the ghrelin receptor. They predate the 1999 discovery of ghrelin itself; they were the pharmacological tools that led to the receptor being identified in the first place.

  • GHRP-6 — a hexapeptide, the prototype of the class.
  • GHRP-2 (pralmorelin) — a “non-natural super-analog” of GHRP-6.
  • Hexarelin (examorelin) — also a GHRP-6 super-analog; additionally reported to bind CD36, a scavenger receptor, which is the basis of its cardiac claims.

They act on pituitary somatotrophs and on the hypothalamus, and they are synergistic with GHRH because that is a different receptor. Critically, GHS-R1a agonism is not GH-specific: the same pathway drives ACTH and cortisol release and, centrally, appetite.

The marketing claim to distrust. Vendors present each of these as having a distinct therapeutic niche. The human comparative data does not support that. In the key head-to-head study, GHRP-2 and hexarelin were essentially equipotent. The differences between these three are potency and selectivity gradations, not different mechanisms.

2. The human doses — from the actual studies

This class is unusual in that the human data is real. It is worth being precise about what was studied, because it is nothing like the way these are marketed.

Table of published human studies of GHRP-2, GHRP-6 and hexarelin with doses and key findings
Note the units: these are micrograms per kilogram, in single-digit totals for an adult. Most protocols circulating online are far higher.

Two of those deserve attention. Massoud 1996 found that hexarelin’s prolactin ED50 (0.39 µg/kg) was lower than its GH ED50 (0.48 µg/kg) — meaning prolactin rises before growth hormone does. And it found a step increase in cortisol of about 40% at 0.5 µg/kg, with no cortisol rise at all at 0.125 µg/kg. That last detail is the one genuinely useful dosing insight in this literature: low-dose hexarelin combined with GHRH produced large GH release with no rise in cortisol.

Rahim 1998 is the one that should give anyone pause about continuous use. Sixteen weeks of hexarelin at 1.5 µg/kg twice daily saw the GH response fall from 19.1 to 12.3 at four weeks and 10.5 at sixteen weeks — and recover to 19.4 four weeks after stopping. The authors’ conclusion was “partial and reversible attenuation,” with the biological impact on the GH–IGF-I axis described as “minimal.”

3. The off-target effects, attributed precisely

Statistics panel showing cortisol response comparable to hCRH, 180 percent prolactin rise, 35.9 percent food intake increase and 45 percent GH attenuation
The ACTH and cortisol releasing activity of GHRP-2 and hexarelin was described as similar to hCRH — a deliberate corticotropin challenge.

One correction worth making, because it circulates constantly: the appetite data is for GHRP-2, not GHRP-6. The controlled human study showing a 35.9% increase in food intake used GHRP-2. GHRP-6’s reputation as the appetite peptide rests on animal work and mechanistic analogy to ghrelin. We could not find a controlled human trial of GHRP-6 on food intake. If a vendor states it as established, they have not read the source.

Hexarelin’s cardiac claims deserve similar scepticism. They rest on CD36 binding, animal ischemia models and small acute human hemodynamic studies. There is no clinical outcome trial — no mortality, hospitalisation or durable function endpoint. That is not a basis for any cardiac claim in patient-facing content, and we are not going to make one.

4. Where these actually stand with the FDA

Table of regulatory and anti-doping status for GHRP-2, GHRP-6, hexarelin, ipamorelin, sermorelin and tesamorelin
None of the first four is on the 503A bulks list. Hexarelin’s absence from Category 2 means only that nobody nominated it — it is not a permission.

The FDA’s stated reasoning for keeping these in Category 2 is specific and worth quoting in substance. For GHRP-2 it cites immunogenicity risk from aggregation and peptide-related impurities, plus serious adverse events in the literature including increased insulin requirement, infection, pancreatitis and death. For GHRP-6 it cites the same immunogenicity concern plus effects on cortisol and blood glucose. Ipamorelin carries the same immunogenicity language, with the agency citing serious adverse events including death via intravenous administration.

The ipamorelin claim that rests on animals. Ipamorelin is widely sold as the “clean, selective” secretagogue that does not raise cortisol or prolactin. That selectivity finding is real — and it comes from a 1998 paper whose experiments were conducted in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats and conscious swine. There were no human subjects. Ipamorelin is in FDA Category 2, is named on the WADA list, and has no clearer regulatory pathway than GHRP-2 or GHRP-6. It is simply better marketed.

5. What has a genuine pathway instead

Tesamorelin is the only agent in this whole class with an FDA approval — a GHRH analog approved in 2010 for reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV patients with lipodystrophy. Real label, real phase 3 data, real safety monitoring. Everything outside that indication is off-label.

Sermorelin had approvals — GEREF, for pediatric growth hormone deficiency and pituitary testing — and was withdrawn from sale in 2009. The FDA formally determined in 2013 that it was not withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness, which was a business decision. That determination is what permits generic referencing; it is not an endorsement of compounded sermorelin, and no sermorelin product is FDA-approved today. We wrote about it in detail in our sermorelin dosage and protocol guide.

6. What a responsible clinic should tell you

  • The human data is real but old, tiny and mostly diagnostic. These were studied as provocative endocrine agents and in short pediatric trials, not as healthy-adult wellness interventions.
  • The GH effect attenuates. Chronic hexarelin halved the GH response within sixteen weeks. Continuous use is not supported by the data that exists.
  • They are not GH-selective. Cortisol, prolactin and appetite effects are documented in humans at the doses studied.
  • There is no lawful compounding route. Not for GHRP-2, GHRP-6, hexarelin or ipamorelin.
  • Any tested athlete will fail. All are explicitly named under WADA S2.2 as non-Specified substances prohibited in and out of competition. There is no exemption available.
  • If the goal is the GH axis, ask about the agent with a label. That conversation is worth having and is free.

We would rather lose the booking than publish a dosing protocol for something the FDA has placed in a category defined by identified significant safety risks.

If you came here looking for a protocol, we understand the disappointment — and we would point you instead toward provider-led protocols under medical supervision, and toward a baseline panel that tells you whether the GH axis is actually where your problem is. Fatigue and poor recovery are far more often sleep, thyroid, iron or genuine hormone deficiency — all of which have real treatments.

Visit BHRC West Los Angeles
1860 S Sepulveda Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90025
(310) 861-3748 · Monday–Friday 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM, Saturday 9:00 AM – 4:00 PM
Treatment by the BHRC clinical team
4.8 stars across 287 verified reviews
Provider-led peptide and hormone protocols are run here.
Consultations are free and carry no obligation.

Questions we get asked

What’s the difference between GHRP-2, GHRP-6 and hexarelin?

Less than the marketing suggests. All three are ghrelin receptor agonists. In the key head-to-head human study, GHRP-2 and hexarelin produced similar GH responses, both greater than GHRH, and both raised prolactin, ACTH and cortisol. The differences are potency and selectivity gradations.

Is ipamorelin safer because it’s selective?

The selectivity finding comes from experiments in anesthetized rats and conscious swine — there were no human subjects. Ipamorelin is in FDA Category 2 with the same immunogenicity concerns as GHRP-2 and GHRP-6, and the FDA cites serious adverse events including death via IV administration.

Can a clinic legally prescribe these?

None is on the FDA’s 503A bulks list, none has a USP monograph, and none is a component of an approved drug — so none satisfies any of the three statutory routes for compounding. GHRP-2, GHRP-6 and ipamorelin are additionally in Category 2.

Will the GH effect keep working if I stay on it?

The one chronic-dosing human study found the GH response roughly halved within sixteen weeks, recovering four weeks after stopping. That is the only human data on sustained administration, and it argues against continuous use.

Will these show up on a drug test?

Yes. GHRP-2, GHRP-6, hexarelin (named as examorelin), ipamorelin and sermorelin are all explicitly listed under WADA S2.2 as non-Specified substances prohibited at all times — in and out of competition.

What should I take instead?

That depends entirely on what you are trying to fix, which is why the answer starts with labs. Tesamorelin is the only agent in this class with an FDA-approved indication, and it is narrow. For most people who come in asking about secretagogues, the useful conversation turns out to be about sleep, thyroid or genuine hormone deficiency.

Keep reading

Book at any of our six locations

References

  1. Arvat E, di Vito L, Maccagno B, et al. — Effects of GHRP-2 and hexarelin on GH, prolactin, ACTH and cortisol levels in man. Peptides 1997;18(6):885–891. doi.org
  2. Massoud AF, Hindmarsh PC, Brook CG — Hexarelin-induced growth hormone, cortisol and prolactin release: a dose-response study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81(12):4338–4341. doi.org
  3. Rahim A, O’Neill PA, Shalet SM — Growth hormone status during long-term hexarelin therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83(5):1644–1649. academic.oup.com
  4. Laferrère B, Abraham C, Russell CD, Bowers CY — Growth hormone releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2), like ghrelin, increases food intake in healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90(2):611–614. academic.oup.com
  5. Mericq V, Cassorla F, Bowers CY, et al. — Effects of eight months treatment with graded doses of a GH-releasing peptide in GH-deficient children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83(7):2355–2360. academic.oup.com
  6. Raun K, Hansen BS, Johansen NL, et al. — Ipamorelin, the first selective growth hormone secretagogue. Eur J Endocrinol 1998;139(5):552–561 — note: rat and swine experiments. doi.org
  7. U.S. Food and Drug Administration — Certain bulk drug substances for use in compounding that may present significant safety risks — Category 2, including GHRP-2, GHRP-6 and ipamorelin. fda.gov
  8. World Anti-Doping Agency — The 2026 Prohibited List — section S2.2, growth hormone releasing peptides and secretagogues. wada-ama.org
  9. U.S. Federal Register — Determination that GEREF (sermorelin acetate) injection was not withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness, 4 March 2013. federalregister.gov
  10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration — EGRIFTA (tesamorelin) prescribing information, NDA 022505 — the only FDA-approved agent in this class. accessdata.fda.gov

Beverly Hills Rejuvenation Center. This content is for general education and does not create a physician-patient relationship or constitute medical advice. GHRP-2, GHRP-6, hexarelin and ipamorelin are not FDA-approved, do not appear on either FDA compounding bulks list, and are prohibited at all times under the WADA Prohibited List. This article reports published research doses; it is not a protocol and BHRC does not recommend one. Candidacy, dosing, results and pricing vary by person and are confirmed at a free consultation. Reviewed by the BHRC clinical team.

Request a Consultation

LIMITED APPOINTMENTS AVAILABLE

"*" indicates required fields

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Terms*
I Consent to Receive SMS and Email Notifications, Alerts & Occasional Marketing Communication from BHRC. Message Frequency Varies. Message & Data Rates May Apply. You Can Reply STOP to Unsubscribe from SMS at Any Time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Blog Category:

Related Blogs from Bhrc

How to Reconstitute Peptides: Bacteriostatic Water, Syringe Math & Storage Image

How to Reconstitute Peptides: Bacteriostatic Water, Syringe Math & Storage

Correct peptide reconstitution: why you aim the stream at the glass wall, why you never shake, the U-100 syringe math worked twice, and where the 28-day beyond-use rule actually comes from.

Learn More
Peptide Therapy Cost: What a Real, Supervised Program Actually Costs in 2026 Image

Peptide Therapy Cost: What a Real, Supervised Program Actually Costs in 2026

What supervised peptide therapy actually costs: labs, consultation, pharmacy sourcing and monitoring. Plus the 2026 FDA compounding rules almost every competitor site gets wrong.

Learn More
NAD+ vs. NMN vs. NR: Dosage, Absorption & What the Human Evidence Supports Image

NAD+ vs. NMN vs. NR: Dosage, Absorption & What the Human Evidence Supports

NMN’s FDA status was resolved in 2025. NR has the most replicated data. IV NAD+ has almost no outcome evidence. An honest, fully-cited comparison of all three from BHRC.

Learn More